Skip to content
Icon

(02) 9455 6000

Contact us
Wellbridge Solutions
  • For Insurers
    • Health Insurers
      • Second Opinion Service
    • Life Insurers
      • Expert Medical Opinion
    • Liability and Statutory Insurance
      • Medical File Reviews
  • For Employers
    • Medical File Reviews
  • For Lawyers
    • Medical File Reviews
  • About us
    • About us
    • Case studies
    • Contact us

For Insurers

Health Insurers

  • Second Opinion Service

Life Insurers

  • Expert Medical Opinion

Liability and Statutory Insurance

  • Medical File Reviews

For Employers

Medical File Reviews

For Lawyers

Medical File Reviews

About us

About us

Case studies

Contact us

Make a referral

Case Study

Health advice: Colorectal surgery

A member with a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), complicated by hypogammaglobulinaemia, thrombocytopenia and a compromised immune system requiring intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), sought a second opinion through their life insurer’s member benefits program regarding a recommended laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

The member had a history of daily bowel distension and constipation. A PET-CT scan identified a malpositioned caecum with flattening of the proximal ascending colon, suggestive of intermittent partial bowel obstruction. Following review by a colorectal surgeon, a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was recommended. However, the member was concerned about the balance of surgical risks and benefits given their underlying immune status.

The case was allocated to an independent colorectal surgeon, who reviewed the member’s medical records, including the recent PET-CT scan and haematologist’s report, before conducting a telephone consultation.

The specialist advised that surgery was not currently recommended, as the member’s compromised immune system significantly increased the risks associated with major surgery, particularly the risk of infection. They recommended obtaining formal clearance from the treating haematologist, together with an assessment by a perioperative physician to evaluate and, where possible, reduce the surgical risks.

Photo of a doctor shaking hands with a patient

Outcome

As the member’s symptoms were well controlled, the specialist advised that the bowel malrotation was not life-threatening and surgery was not mandatory at this stage. They also recommended further investigation of gastrointestinal transit time, including assessment of gastric, small bowel and colonic transit. If the symptoms were found to be related to slow-transit constipation, a partial colectomy might not provide significant benefit if slow transit was affecting other parts of the bowel.

The member was also advised that, should they experience symptoms suggestive of an acute bowel obstruction, they should present to hospital promptly for assessment.

  • Health Insurers
    • Second Opinion Service
  • Life Insurers
    • Expert Medical Opinion
  • Liability and Statutory Insurance
    • Medical File Reviews
  • Lawyers
    • Medical File Reviews
  • Employers
    • Medical File Reviews
Wellbridge Solutions

Contact us


Icon

WellBridge Solutions

(02) 9455 6000

contact@wellbridgesolutions.com.au

Go back to top

Copyright © 2026 WellBridge Solutions. Designed and developed by Moo Marketing.

Privacy Policy

Accessibility

Terms and conditions

Decoration
Decoration